
The Romans were amazing. Not only did conquer the known world, but they were also brilliant in their knowledge of science, politics, agriculture, engineering, medicine, need I go on? Anyone who has had the opportunity to visit Italy can still see and even feel the Roman influence through out the country. So how does this relate to moose? Well the Romans as far we know gave us the first actual description of the moose or elk as they are referred to it in Europe.
In Julius Ceaser’s “Commentarii de Bello Gallico” written between 40 and 50 BC, which I have not read, details the Romans wars with the Gauls(celtic people) during the Gallic Wars. Besides giving a detailed account of the wars with Gauls they also give useful information on the history and geography of the area. This area which included both Germany and possibly Scandinavia was where moose were probably first encountered. The book says in regarding moose:
“There are also [animals], which are called elks. The shape of these, and the varied colour of their skins, is much like roes, but in size they surpass them a little and are destitute of horns, and have legs without joints and ligatures; nor do they lie down for the purpose of rest, nor, if they have been thrown down by any accident, can they raise or lift themselves up. Trees serve as beds to them ; they lean themselves against them, and thus reclining only slightly, they take their rest; when the huntsmen have discovered from the footsteps of these animals whither they are accustomed to betake themselves, they either undermine all the trees at the roots, or cut into them so far that the upper part of the trees may appear to be left standing. When they have leant upon them, according to their habit, they knock down by their weight the unsupported trees, and fall down themselves along with them.”
Pliny the Elder who in 77 AD wrote Naturalis Historia an encyclopedia detailing all the current about nearly all the ancient world, also talked of the moose or as he referred to them “achlis” in the chapter “The Animals of the North”:
“..there is, also, the elk, which strongly resembles our steers, except that it is distinguished by the length of the ears and of the neck. There is also the achlis which is produced in the island of Scandinavia; it has never been seen in this city, although we have had descriptions of it from many persons; it is not unlike the elk, but has no joints in the hind leg. Hence, it never lies down, but reclines against a tree while it sleeps; it can only be taken by previously cutting into the tree, and thus laying a trap for it, as otherwise, it would escape through its swiftness. Its upper lip is so extremely large, for which reason it is obliged to go backwards when grazing; otherwise, by moving onwards, the lip would get doubled up.”
It seems that even back in the 1st century AD that moose were something to talk about, granted I imagine in 1st Century AD moose in Scandinavia were the least of your worries. Vikings would be #1 thing I would be worried about, anyone who saw “Pathfinder” can tell you that. The movie was lame, but the Vikings in it were gnarly.